After you've being successfully attacked, your base is not elegible for more attacks, neither for the same player nor another. This works if the game resources are limited as in this one. After an attack, whenever you get rid of your enemy and revolt, your defenses will start to rebuild automatically without paying extra credits. Also, you can see fleets in the map moving around. This also affects the way routes work, given its more approximate than just a linear approach. Loved the way they made the galaxy/solar system maps, way more credible than other space management games like Ogame, which let you occupy any planet in every solar system.I suggest that you add the Observatório do Algarve article, the interview with the game creator (I believe that the details of the printed version would suffice if a web page cannot be found) and any other reliable references to the references section prior to further action. However as Muchness states, in the article's present state, without references, it is unlikely to fulfill notablity requirements. The comments at the AfD suggest that there may be some support if notability is established. This should not discourage you from following suggestions by Andrewa & Muchness and following the deletion review procedure. Muchness ( talk) 09:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Reply Ĭomment: With regards to the proposed page move, I feel that no consensus to move will be reached here, nor will simply moving the page aid restoration, so I have removed the entry at WP:RM and the move template. For what it's worth, I oppose moving the article to main space at this time, because the article as currently written doesn't make a case for notability per WP:N and WP:WEB: there are no references to establish that the game has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If the game has received significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources, this info should be added to the article with citations. Andrewa ( talk) 10:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Reply I agree, given the history surrounding this article, deletion review might be a better venue to discuss recreating it. Portuguese is one of the larger Wikipedias by article count, larger than Spanish or even Italian, I guess owing to the former colonies and particularly to Brazil. It's also interesting to note that Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games/Article Archive contains links to only two archived articles, and the other archive has itself been deleted.Īnd I even had a look to see whether Portuguese Wikipedia had an article on this particular MMOG. Should this even be considered a move request? Or should it go to Wikipedia:Deletion review, or somewhere else? That's why admin assistance is now needed for this move. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astro Empires for some background to this request.įollowing the decision to delete, the deleted page was recreated several times, speedy-deleted each time and finally, after no fewer than six deletions (most recently 8 October 2007) it was protected. Butch-cassidy ( talk) 00:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Reply Next week the game creator will be published in one of the largest newspapers in Portugal about the game. This week in the observatoriodo algarve Website, the largest regional News site in Algarve, Portugal the home of the game. The game now boasts over 34,000 players, 4 servers and has been published more than once. It is time that the article is moved back. It has been a year since Astro Empires was deleted and moved here in preparation for an eventual return.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |